Incredible Turnout: The Phantoms of Oakland Park
New Times. February 21, 2008
As told to Edmund Newton  
 
Somebody was worrying recently about the sanctity of the vote in Broward County elections. Who was that? Oh, yeah, that would have been Tailpipe. The emissions-spouting cylinder was saying he was particularly stressed out by non-functioning, error-prone voting machines.
 
Well, nobody was passing around chill-out s after the January 29 primary, a mostly unnoteworthy affair with some very strange doings.
 
For a primary election, especially one in which Democratic votes weren't supposed to count in ing delegates, there was a very good turnout — better than 38 percent for Broward County. But nobody expected the kind of turnout that one precinct in Oakland Park got. According to the certified results, precinct D001, with its voting machines in the Collins Community Center on NE 3rd Avenue, racked up 1011 votes that day. Phenomenal, considering there are only 932 registered voters in the area. Not only did every registered voter in the precinct show up, but maybe 79 friends, relatives, and (who knows?) sundry out-of-towners as well.
 
In truth, there are a number of possible explanations for the almost 9 percent overcount. One of the Board of Elections' notoriously balky iVotronics machines, a touchscreen model that will be phased out later this year, could have been up to its old trick of doubling or tripling its results. There could have been defective memory cards in the Collins Community Center machines, spitting out extra votes. Maybe there was some sort of human error involved.
Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes thinks she knows what happened. She responded by telephone to the 'Pipe's questions with a weary patience. "You're calling about precinct D001," she said before the 'Pipe could ask his questions.
 
Elementary, my dear Tailpipe: In a primary there are different ballots for each party. The Democratic Party ballot in this one was designated, like the precinct, D001, Snipes explained. "During the early voting [in the three weeks prior to Election Day], the D001 voters were put into precinct D001." She added that the mistake was "a reporting issue" that had "absolutely no impact on the outcome of the election."
 
This is not good enough for voting rights activists like Ellen Brodsky, one of the leaders in the citizen-run exit poll called Project Vote Count. For one thing, Snipes doesn't explain how those early votes got from three early voting sites, all in Fort Lauderdale, to the Collins voting place, Brodsky says. And there was apparently no post-election investigation of the Collins machines to see if they were malfunctioning. Besides that, Brodsky charges, the Board of Elections had opened early voting on January 8, a day before running the state-required "logic and accuracy" tests to see that machines were operating properly.
 
Brodsky adds that her subsequent research of voting records shows that the problem is not a one-precinct anomaly. There were overcounts of early votes in other precincts as well, though not big enough to raise red flags (eight extra Democratic votes in precinct D002, for example).
 
The foul-ups — whatever their source — may have been insignificant for the January 29 vote, which included just two statewide measures: A vote for a presidential nomination preference and on a property tax amendment. In a more complex election, involving local candidates, a glitch like the one in precinct D001 could irrevocably confuse the results — "the kind of development that would undermine anybody's faith in the system," Brodsky says.
 
In fact, the "certified" vote totals, Brodsky contends, are more like approximations than accurate totals. "It's like, pick a number and they'll certify it," she says.
 
Set 'em up, Joe. The 'Pipe needs a stiff drink.