Home
Site Map
Reports
Voting News
Info
Donate
Contact Us
About Us

VotersUnite.Org
is NOT!
associated with
votersunite.com


Voting news articles are provided here for research and educational purposes only. We do not review each article in its entirety prior to its posting. Content in the articles themselves and on other websites to which they link may express opinions that are not those of VotersUnite!

Alameda County Could Replace Diebold Machines (California)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, August 26, 2005
MATTHEW ARTZ Berkeley Daily Planet 26 August 2005
The Alameda County Board of Supervisors Tuesday will consider accepting bids for new voting machines to replace the controversial Diebold touch-screen voting systems.

County asks residents to test, rate new voting machines (Santa Cruz Co., CA)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, August 26, 2005
BRIAN SEALS Santa Cruz Sentinel 26 August 2005
As the county readies for new voting systems in 2006, it is asking voters to grade six possible new voting machines.

Officials split over voting machines (Mobile Co., AL)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, August 26, 2005
SALLIE OWEN Mobile Register 26 August 2005
ORANGE BEACH Frustrated by delays at the state level, Mobile County Commission President Mike Dean said Thursday that the county should switch to paper ballots read by optical scanners at least for next year's elections.

County mulls 'touchy' subject (Brazoria Co., TX)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, August 25, 2005
Colleen O'Brien Pearland Journal 25 August 2005
Just how safe is your touch-screen digital vote? Does it get recorded correctly? Can the code be manipulated? What if the voting machine breaks down, or worse, switches the vote before your very eyes? How do you conduct an accurate audit? There's a lot of controversy, and a lot of taxpayer's money, whirling around the subject. Fortunately, both sides of the political aisle are behind securing the voting process, including having a paper trail.

Mobile County officials to lease voting equipment (Mobile Co., AL)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, August 25, 2005
SALLIE OWEN Mobile Register 25 August 2005
ORANGE BEACH Because of the continued uncertainty over what kind of voting machines will comply with federal reforms, Mobile County officials have decided to lease equipment for the 2006 elections instead of buying, Commission President Mike Dean said.

Voting Machines - Field narrows to four    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, August 25, 2005
J.D. Prose Beaver County Times 25 August 2005
BEAVER - Beaver County officials have asked four companies to bring their electronic voting systems here for public evaluations, including the maker of the county's former system that was banned by the state this year.

County looks at 'blended' voting (Alameda Co., CA)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, August 25, 2005
Ian Hoffman ANG News 25 August 2005
Alameda County ? the first large West Coast county to gamble on Diebold Election Systems Inc. and its electronic voting machines ? is weighing whether to end that experiment, going with a more paper-based voting system and perhaps another supplier.

Paper trail turns tide for voting machines (Mississippi)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, August 25, 2005
Eric Stringfellow The Clarion-Ledger 25 August 2005
When Secretary of State Eric Clark announced in July plans to purchase new touch-screen voting machines, he didn't seem prepared for the boo birds, especially from other Democrats.

Lafayette County gets voting machines (Mississippi)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, August 25, 2005
Jermaine Jackson The Daily Mississippi 25 August 2005
Lafayette County supervisors have made a decision that affects the way local voters will elect their representation.

Voting machine deadline looms (St Joseph Co., IN)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Thursday, August 25, 2005
JAMES WENSITS South Bend Tribune 25 August 2005
SOUTH BEND As the deadline for meeting a federal requirement to provide handicapped-friendly voting machines looms near, some county officials are talking mutiny.

Electronic voting requires verification (Virginia)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Editorial Roanoke Times 24 August 2005
Virginia shouldn't spend another dime on voting equipment that doesn't provide a paper trail.

Partial recount vindicates San Diego voting machines (San Diego, CA)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Daniel J. Chac?n San Diego UNION-TRIBUNE 24 August 2005

Voting machines that critics have labeled unreliable work after all. A partial recount yesterday to test the accuracy of scanners that read ballots and tallied votes in the San Diego mayor's race July 26 revealed results that were nearly identical to those of the machines.



New voting system under review (Wyoming Co., PA)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Wednesday, August 24, 2005
DIXIE CASSELBURY, Wyoming County Press Examiner 24 August 2005
The new system is being researched by the Wyoming County Commissioners and is called the AccuVote-TSX. The system will come from the Diebold Election Systems, of Texas.

Commissioners face voting machine woes (Fayette Co., PA)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Chris Foreman Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 24 August 2005
Four months before a deadline to meet federal election standards, Fayette County's commissioners believe state-administered grants won't even cover half of the cost to comply with the Help America Vote Act, or HAVA, of 2002

Voting machines raising concerns (Coahoma Co., MS)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Wednesday, August 24, 2005
DAVID OWENS The Clarksdale Press Register 24 August 2005
Seventy six of the state's 82 counties opted into the new touch-screen voting machine system by Friday's deadline. However, in many counties including Coahoma, supervisors didn't see much choice in the matter.

Keep the polls open? Costly move likely (Snohomish Co., WA)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Christopher Schwarzen Seattle Times 24 August 2005
Snohomish County likely will spend more than $1 million to back up electronic voting machines with paper records instead of switching to a cheaper all-mail election system.

Freeholders to case votes for a ballot box (Essex Co., NJ)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Wednesday, August 24, 2005
ERICA ZARRA The Montclair Times 24 August 2005
With the September deadline fast approaching, a decision has not yet been made by Essex County in the battle of the ballot box builders, especially as the electronic voting machine once considered the frontrunner may not meet new state requirements in time for the 2006 elections.

Virginia group pushes voting equipment with paper audit    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, August 23, 2005
TYLER WHITLEY Richmond TIMES-DISPATCH 23 August 2005
Virginia's voting machine of choice got a going-over yesterday from a grass-roots group and computer experts.

Morgan to receive voting equipment (Morgan Co., UT)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, August 23, 2005
Deanne Winterton Standard-Examiner 23 August 2005
MORGAN The Morgan County Council approved a contract with the state Friday that allows the county to move into the computerized age of elections.

Clark needs to deliver on promise    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, August 23, 2005
Opinion Hattiesburg American 23 August 2005

The most accurate elections in the history of Mississippi. That's what Secretary of State Eric Clark promised Friday will be the result of the decision by a vast majority of Mississippi counties to use new electronic, touch-screen voting machines.



Records: 2541-2560 of 6703
<< Prev      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336      Next >>

 
Favorites

Election Problem Log image
2004 to 2009



Previous
Features


Accessibility Issues
Accessibility Issues


Cost Comparisons
Cost Comparisons


Flyers & Handouts
Handouts


VotersUnite News Exclusives


Search by

Copyright © 2004-2010 VotersUnite!