Home
Site Map
Reports
Voting News
Info
Donate
Contact Us
About Us

VotersUnite.Org
is NOT!
associated with
votersunite.com


Voting news articles are provided here for research and educational purposes only. We do not review each article in its entirety prior to its posting. Content in the articles themselves and on other websites to which they link may express opinions that are not those of VotersUnite!

Boosting Hispanic voters    Story Here  Archive
Editorial The Journal News 22 January 2005
Spanish-speaking voters in Westchester, at least, should have less difficulty in voting in future elections if the Westchester County Board of Elections follows an agreement reached with the U.S. Justice Department to provide:

State OKs e-vote printer    Story Here  Archive
MICHELLE DeARMOND / The Press-Enterprise 22 January 2005
Secretary of State Kevin Shelley approved a voting-system printer Friday that will allow San Bernardino County residents to view a paper record of their ballot while casting their votes electronically on a touch-screen machine.

State official OKs e-voting receipts    Story Here  Archive
SCOTT VANHORNE San Bernardino Sun 22 January 2005
California Secretary of State Kevin Shelley on Friday approved a long-awaited voter-verified receipt for electronic voting machines despite detractors' claims that it may undermine ballot secrecy.

A 'yes' vote for Ohio election reform    Story Here  Archive
Diane Solov and Diane Suchetka Cleveland Plain Dealer 22 January 2005
The list of complaints about Ohio's presidential election is long.

New election system hit glitches, records reveal    Story Here  Archive
MICHELLE NICOLOSI AND PHUONG CAT LE Seattle Post Intelligencer 22 January 2005
Many of King County's problems with missing and delayed ballots, rejected votes and duplicate ballots sent to voters this fall can be traced to one culprit: human error.

Machines' vote tracking acceptable    Story Here  Archive
NICHOLAS CHARALAMBOUS Anderson Independent-Mail 22 January 2005
An audit of vote tallies shows no major discrepancies in the recording of ballots by the iVotronic touch-screen voting system used for the first time in Anderson and 12 other counties on Nov. 2. All 46 counties in South Carolina will use the system in 2006.

Travis County Reports Success With Voting Machines    Story Here  Archive
KXAN-TV 21 January 2005
While some states reported problems with their electronic voting machines in the last election, officials in Travis County have nothing but good things to say about the machines that Austin voters used.

Lawmaker argues for paper trail in new voting systems    Story Here  Archive
MIKE GLOVER, Associated Press 21 January 2005
DES MOINES With the state poised to its voting machines, a key lawmaker on Thursday said that any new system that is adopted should include a backup that allows for a manual recount in disputed elections.

Bush/Rove's new Ohio attack is about revenge, intimidation and contempt for American democracy    Story Here  Archive
Opinion Harvey Wasserman Columbus Free Press 21 January 2005
As the toxic dust settles on George W. Bush's second illegitimate inauguration, his moral legacy has been defined by the GOP's new attack on Ohio's 2004 election challenge legal team.

Electronic voting issues, problems topic of session    Story Here  Archive
DARRYL NEWMAN, Los Alamos Monitor 21 January 2005

The necessity of being able to track errors within electronic voting machines was the topic of a presentation by a local computer scientist Thursday night at the Mesa Public Library. Charlie Strauss, a member of Verified Voting New Mexico, presented "The Trouble with Electronic Voting" in a talk sponsored by the League of Women Voters Los Alamos.



N.C. voting machine committee pares down recommendations    Story Here  Archive
Associated Press 21 January 2005
A legislative committee examining electronic voting machine reforms pared down their recommendations Friday to present to the General Assembly when it convenes next week.

Stolen or Lost?    Story Here  Archive
Steven F. Freeman, AlterNet. Posted January 20, 2005.
Russ Baker's critique of my work analyzing the exit poll discrepancy ("Election 2004: Stolen or Lost") ? and, by implication, of the courageous stand taken by John Conyers and a small number of his Congressional colleagues ? is flawed from the first line. No one has said, "Exit poll results were more accurate than actual ballots." The question is whether the official count is an accurate reflection of ballots cast. In a system where campaign managers serve as election supervisors, where voting machines provide no assurance that votes are counted as cast, and where counts and "recounts" are conducted in secret, we must rely, unfortunately, on indirect evidence, such as exit polls, to ascertain the veracity of this official count as a measure of actual ballots cast.

Elections board to attend optical scan voting conference    Story Here  Archive
Matt Suman Seneca County Advertiser-Tribune 20 January 2005
The Seneca County Board of Elections will learn more next week about optical scan voting machines that will soon replace punch card ballots.

Judge's Ruling Allows County Clerks To Clear Voting Machines for Upcoming Elections    Story Here  Archive
Andy Lenderman and Jeff Jones Albuquerque Journal 20 January 2005
New Mexico's 33 county clerks can clear 2004 general election ballot data from electronic voting machines after a state District Court judge ruled against an attempt to preserve the information.

Officials discuss voting operations    Story Here  Archive
GREG BISCHOF Texarkana Gazette 20 January 2005
MOUNT PLEASANT, Texas -The effects of the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election in Florida are still being felt nationwide and will likely make a tangible showing in Bowie County before next January.

Open Letter to Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro from Representative John Conyers, Jr.    Story Here  Archive
Letter from Conyers to Petro Columbus Free Press 20 January 2005
I write to express my concern regarding your recent request to sanction those attorneys who brought a legal challenge to last year's presidential election in Ohio. In particular, I am concerned that by seeking official censure and fines, you are engaged in a ive and partisan misuse of your legal authority. As eager as many disgruntled voters are to have a court of law finally assess the merits of the challenge actions, I have serious doubts about the validity of the sanctions case your office is pursuing.

What are they hiding in New Mexico?    Story Here  Archive
Warren Stewart, National Ballot Integrity Project Columbus Free Press 19 January 2005
In the shadow of overwhelming irregularities in the Ohio?s election, New Mexico has played out it?s own post-election drama almost unnoticed by anyone outside the state. Even before the November 2, New Mexico had been in the news for reports of malfunctioning voting machines and other problems. Hundreds of incidents were reported on Election Day. The state got some national attention for once again leading the nation in undervote rate. All this coupled with a small margin of victory in the presidential race (just 3/4 of 1%) led to concern about the accuracy of the results.

Diebold could lose out in Ohio    Story Here  Archive
Erika D. Smith Akron Beacon Journal 19 January 2005
Word that Ohio is shunning touch-screens for optical-scan voting machines is attracting competition for Diebold Inc.

Attorney general's call to punish lawyer is reply to election challenge    Story Here  Archive
Reginald Fields Cleveland Plain Dealer 19 January 2005
 Ohio's attorney general has asked the state's high court to sanction a lawyer who counseled a group filing legal challenges to last year's presidential election.

Judge Denies Motion To Stop Clerks From Erasing Election Data    Story Here  Archive
Associated Press 19 January 2005
A judge has ruled against an attempt to prevent county clerks from erasing general election data from voting machines, clearing the way for clerks to prepare for Feb. 1 school board elections

Records: 3781-3800 of 6703
<< Prev      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336      Next >>

 
Favorites

Election Problem Log image
2004 to 2009



Previous
Features


Accessibility Issues
Accessibility Issues


Cost Comparisons
Cost Comparisons


Flyers & Handouts
Handouts


VotersUnite News Exclusives


Search by

Copyright © 2004-2010 VotersUnite!