Voting machine maker criticized for problems    Story Here  Archive

Published:Thursday, March 25, 2004 By Guy Ashley for the Contra Costa Times OAKLAND - Alameda County officials met Wednesday with representatives of Diebold Elections Systems, indicating they were ready to get tough with the company should problems continue with the county's $12 million Diebold electronic voting system.

Expanding access for voters    Story Here  Archive

Published:Thursday, March 25, 2004 Article in FortWayne.com The Allen County Election Board's early start on buying handicapped-accessible voting machines shows a welcome commitment to complying with new requirements for making voting easier for voters with disabilities.

Blackwell tells 5 counties he'll pick vote machines    Story Here  Archive

Published:Thursday, March 25, 2004 By JIM PROVANCE for the Toledo Blade COLUMBUS - Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell has told five counties that have yet to new voting machines that he will make the choice for them next week.

Diebold vows to fix e-voting problems    Story Here  Archive

Published:Thursday, March 25, 2004 by Ian Hoffman for the Tri-Valley Herald The president of Diebold Election Systems pledged Wednesday to fix multiple problems plaguing its oldest touchscreen-voting customer on the West Coast.

Group that called electronic vote secure got makers' aid    Story Here  Archive

Published:Thursday, March 25, 2004 By LINDA K. HARRIS for the Philadelphia Enquirer in the Mercury News The Election Center, which trains election workers and advises Congress and government agencies on election process issues, has taken donations from manufacturers of electronic voting machines even as it has issued strong statements supporting the security of the machines.

Editorial: District 28 recount crucial e-voting test    Story Here  Archive

Published:Wednesday, March 24, 2004 Editorial in the San Antonio Express-News For Bexar County voters, the March 9 primaries marked an important step in voting technology. They were the first test of the county's new $8.1 million touch-screen system.

Clerk hires consultant to help with primary    Story Here  Archive

Published:Wednesday, March 24, 2004 by Andy Gammill for IndyStar (IN) Citing concerns about the integrity of the May 4 primary, Johnson County's clerk of the courts has hired a consultant to help coordinate logistics for the election. Clerk Jill Jackson said she no longer trusts Election Systems & Software, the company on contract to provide voting equipment and help conduct the election.

Alameda County gets tough with voting machine contractor    Story Here  Archive

Published:Wednesday, March 24, 2004 By Guy Ashley in the Contra Costa Times OAKLAND - Alameda County officials met this morning with representatives from Diebold Elections Systems, indicating they were ready to get tough with the company should problems with its new $12 million electronic voting system recur.

Electronic voting may soon make its mark in Hays County    Story Here  Archive

Published:Wednesday, March 24, 2004 By JEFF WALKER - Staff Reporter in the San Marcos Daily Record (TX) Hays County voters may get their hands on some of the new electronic voting machines this fall - if only for a test. Audience members got a taste of the new voting method during the Hays County Commissioner's Court meeting Tuesday.

Senate expected to support paper ballots    Story Here  Archive

Published:Wednesday, March 24, 2004 by Steven T. Dennis for GazetteNet (MD) ANNAPOLIS The Senate is poised to pass a bipartisan bill this week requiring paper receipts to be added to the state's controversial $74 million Diebold voting system.

Diebold chosen for Summit    Story Here  Archive

Published:Wednesday, March 24, 2004 By Lisa A. Abraham and Erika D. Smith for the Akron Beacon-Journal Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell has told the Summit County Board of Elections to buy its electronic voting machines from Diebold Inc. The Green-based company already had been chosen by more than 40 Ohio counties, as the state converts from punch cards and lever pulls to electronic voting.

Vote machine decision may not be final    Story Here  Archive

Published:Wednesday, March 24, 2004 Editorial in the Dayton Daily News THE FIGHT OVER HIGH-TECH VOTING MACHINES has become a multi-ring circus. Montgomery County is under pressure from Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell to choose which kind of machine it wants as a replacement for the old punch-card system. Nearly all other Ohio counties have already chosen.

County warns touchscreen firm    Story Here  Archive

Published:Wednesday, March 24, 2004 By Ian Hoffman, STAFF WRITER for the Daily Review (CA) The oldest West Coast customer of Diebold Election Systems is calling company executives on the carpet today, citing "disappointment and dissatisfaction" with Diebold voting equipment.

Voting Technology    Story Here  Archive

Published:Wednesday, March 24, 2004 by Susan Reefer in the Gotham Gazette (NY) Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in affairs which properly concern them,” the French critic and poet Paul Valery once said.

Will history repeat itself?    Story Here  Archive

Published:Wednesday, March 24, 2004 By Bennett Grossman for the University of South Florida Oracle With the November presidential elections little more than seven months away, there is concern about how citizens' votes will be recorded. In question is the credibility of electronic voting and touch screen voting systems in particular.

New voting machines already obsolete    Story Here  Archive

Published:Wednesday, March 24, 2004 By JAMES WENSITS of the South Bend Tribune SOUTH BEND The possibility that St. Joseph County's new voting machines could be headed for the scrap heap loomed large Tuesday, thanks largely to the reality of new federal election laws.

Touch-screen suit to be heard before vote    Story Here  Archive

Published:Tuesday, March 23, 2004 By George Bennett, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer FORT LAUDERDALE U.S. Rep. Robert Wexler's federal lawsuit challenging paperless electronic voting will go to trial before the November elections, a judge ruled Monday.

Miami County, Ohio, Nears Decision on Voting System    Story Here  Archive

Published:Tuesday, March 23, 2004 By Nancy Bowman, Dayton Daily News, Ohio Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News Mar. 23TROY, Ohio - State Sen. Tom Roberts gained insight on Monday into the intricacies of Miami County's optical scanning election system, which currently tallies votes for the county. Election board members, in turn, got a taste of some of the discussion that will surround the board's upcoming decision on how county voters will cast their ballots.

Grand Jury Won't Investigate Vote Machines    Story Here  Archive

Published:Tuesday, March 23, 2004 By Stuart Pfeifer, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer The Orange County Grand Jury has decided not to review problems with the county's new voting machines in the March 2 election, and instead will rely on two county supervisors to investigate the matter, the panel's foreman said Monday.

LePore dodges vote of confidence    Story Here  Archive

Published:Tuesday, March 23, 2004 By Joel Engelhardt, Palm Beach Post Editorial Writer If Florida finds itself this November in a 2000-style election brawl, the public could be denied one of its most precious civic possessions: the right to inspect the ballots.

Records: 5881-5900 of 6703 << Prev      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336      Next >>