Home
Site Map
Reports
Voting News
Info
Donate
Contact Us
About Us

VotersUnite.Org
is NOT!
associated with
votersunite.com


Voting news articles are provided here for research and educational purposes only. We do not review each article in its entirety prior to its posting. Content in the articles themselves and on other websites to which they link may express opinions that are not those of VotersUnite!

Commentary:Instant Runoff Voting Held Up by Diebold (California)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, May 3, 2005
LAURENCE SCHECHTMAN The Berkeley Daily 03 May 2005
Is the Diebold Corporation, famous for hackable, paperless voting machines, trying to strangle election reform in Berkeley? Or are they merely greedy, lazy and incompetent?

County votes for eSlate voting system    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, May 3, 2005
SESHADRI KUMAR Fort Bend Sun 03 May 2005
Voters in Fort Bend County are likely to use the eSlate electronic voting machines in March 2006 party primaries. A 3-2 vote by Fort Bend County Commissioners Court last week paved the way for the election administration to begin negotiations with the eSlate manufacturer HartIntercivics.

Gregoire Signs Election Reform Package    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, May 3, 2005
KOMO Staff & News Services 3 May 2005
OLYMPIA - Gov. Christine Gregoire on Tuesday signed a batch of bills introduced as a result of her contested election, including measures that will streamline election standards across the state and enhance voter registration records.

Secretary's office says vendor running out of time (Ohio)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Tuesday, May 3, 2005
Associated Press 03 May 2005
COLUMBUS, Ohio - A voting machine maker that sued the state over a decision by its chief elections official that allows counties to buy touch-screen electronic machines only from a rival company is running out of time to present its system to state officials, a lobbyist for Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell said Tuesday.

How Albany picks a new voting machine (New York)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Monday, May 2, 2005
Erik Kriss Syracus Post-Standard 02 May 2005
There's a million-dollar battle raging over what kinds of voting machines New Yorkers will use starting next year.

Vote Fraud Theorists Battle Over Plausibility    Story Here  Archive
Published:Monday, May 2, 2005
Terry M. Neal Washington Post 24 April 2005
After my recent column on President Bush's popularity woes, a torrent of e-mail flooded in from angry Democrats insisting that Bush's relative lack of popularity only reinforced their belief that the 2004 election was stolen.

ES&S Files Legal Action to Maintain Choice in Ohio's Voting System Selection Process    Story Here  Archive
Published:Monday, May 2, 2005
Press Release ES&S 02 May 2005
n a lawsuit filed today, Election Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S) - a leading provider of Ohio's election equipment and services - states that recent actions by the Ohio Secretary of State's office would unfairly eliminate the opportunity for Ohio counties to choose election systems from competing firms. This ion process is part of a statewide effort to comply with the federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA). The lawsuit, filed in the Court of Common Pleas in Franklin County, Ohio, seeks a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to enforce the terms of a signed contract that ES&S has with Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell and prevent the Secretary from implementing several unilateral directives his office issued to counties in mid-April.

Voter ID proposals threaten civil rights    Story Here  Archive
Published:Monday, May 2, 2005
RYAN PAUL HAYGOOD Progressive Media Project Charlotte Observer 02 May 2005
The Voting Rights Act was passed 40 years ago. Shamelessly, several states are considering voter identification bills that threaten to undo much of the progress made during the civil rights era.

Proposal for new Las Vegas-area voting machines questioned (Nevada)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Monday, May 2, 2005
ELIZABETH WHITE Associated Press 02 May 2005
CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) - A Nevada Senate panel on Monday questioned the need for new voting machines in the Las Vegas-area, saying the county's current technology may not have to be replaced.

Maker of voting machines sues state (Ohio)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Monday, May 2, 2005
JOHN McCARTHY Associated Press 02 May 2005
COLUMBUS, Ohio - A voting machine maker on Monday sued the state over a decision by its chief elections official that allows counties to buy touch-screen electronic machines only from a rival company.

Failed voting system fine for other states    Story Here  Archive
Published:Sunday, May 1, 2005
JD Prose Beaver County and Allegheny Times 01 May 2005
Whatever happens with the Patriot touch-screen voting system in Pennsylvania, Susan Miller is sure of one thing: It won't affect what happens in her county.

Touch-screen voting system officially out (Pennsylvania)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Sunday, May 1, 2005
Tom Barnes and Brian David, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 01 May 2005
The state Department of Elections has affirmed its decision to dump the UniLect touch-screen voting system used in Beaver, Greene and Mercer counties.

County narrows choice for new voting machines (Whatcom Co., WA)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Sunday, May 1, 2005
JON GAMBRELL THE BELLINGHAM HERALD 01 May 2005
As Whatcom County prepares to replace its punch-card ballots with a vote-by-mail system for September's primary election, officials are weighing offers from two companies that make voting machines.

Outdated voting machines must go (Pennsylvania)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Sunday, May 1, 2005
Bobby Kerlik Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 01 May 2005
Time is running out for election officials nationwide to get rid of lever and other outdated voting machines by 2006 to meet new federal guidelines.

Group moving ahead with HAVA plan (Hale Co., TX)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Sunday, May 1, 2005
KEVIN LEWIS The Plainview Daily Herald 01 May 2005
Heard of HAVA? Well, you?ll likely be hearing a lot about it in the coming months.

System ain't broke - why must we fix it? (Editorial - Lake Co., OH)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Sunday, May 1, 2005
Editorial News-Herald 01 May 2005
There may be no greater example of injustice in government than the situation Lake County finds itself in with regard to its voting machines. The machines work perfectly well. The voters like them. They produce results that are 100 percent reliable. And they provide fast reports.

Elections chief after 78% bigger budget (Palm Beach Co., FL)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Saturday, April 30, 2005
George Bennett Palm Beach Post 30 April 2005
Elections Supervisor Arthur Anderson wants a massive budget increase to add staff, open a Belle Glade office, upgrade technology and purchase 500 more voting machines to keep pace with population growth.

County picks e-voting (Median Co., OH)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, April 29, 2005
Julie Wallace Akron Beacon 29 April 2005
Come November, voters in Medina County will cast their ballots in the most up-to-date way.

Counting error overstates votes (Kershaw Co., SC)    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, April 29, 2005
KRISTY EPPLEY RUPON The State 29 April 2005
Human error is being blamed for a mistake that overturned results from Tuesday?s Republican primary in a special election for Kershaw County Council.

UniLect voting machine remains barred in Pennsylvania    Story Here  Archive
Published:Friday, April 29, 2005
MARC LEVY Associated Press 29 April 2005
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) ? State election officials on Friday refused to lift their ban on a touch-screen voting machine that was used in three western Pennsylvania counties despite the manufacturer's attempts to get them to reconsider.

Records: 3161-3180 of 6703
<< Prev      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336      Next >>

 
Favorites

Election Problem Log image
2004 to 2009



Previous
Features


Accessibility Issues
Accessibility Issues


Cost Comparisons
Cost Comparisons


Flyers & Handouts
Handouts


VotersUnite News Exclusives


Search by

Copyright © 2004-2010 VotersUnite!